Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2015-10-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the LG V10, getting an 83.8 score against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than the LG V10. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful processor than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger number of cores.
The LG V10 counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes clearer pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a back facing camera with a much better 25 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V10 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with improved battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.