Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the LG V10, getting a score of 80 against 78.6. The Google Pixel 3 body is incredibly newer, a little bit thinner and way lighter than LG V10. The Google Pixel 3 features a better performance than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 3 also has 7 more CPU cores.
The LG V10 has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a little larger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch of display. LG V10 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V10 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and better 120 fps video frame rates.
LG V10 features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.