Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the LG V10's general score of 78.6. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is a lot newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG V10. The LG V10 features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite smaller display.
The LG V10 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a better processor than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a larger number of faster cores.
The LG V10 takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a much better 16 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a little better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.