Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than LG V10's 78.6 general score. These devices work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks. Google Pixel 3a is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also way lighter and a little bit thinner than LG V10.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little better processing power than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a also has more processing cores. LG V10 features a better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a quite bigger display and a little bit better screen pixels density.
LG V10 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution and the same camera aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and faster 120 frames per second video frame rate.
The LG V10 and the Google Pixel 3a both have very similar batteries duration.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3a is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.