Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the LG V10's overall score of 78.6. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a XL has newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it counts with some additional features and performance tweaks. Google Pixel 3a XL is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than LG V10.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit better processing power than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has more cores. LG V10 counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
LG V10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V10 also counts with better video frame rate and a camera with lot more megapixels.
LG V10 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a XL features superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3a XL is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.