Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the LG V10's global score of 78.6. Google Pixel 4's construction is much newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than the LG V10. LG V10 features a much better screen than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V10 also has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a bit greater pixel count in each display inch.
LG V10 has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 has a faster processing unit than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
LG V10 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2800mAh. LG V10 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations and a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rate and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Google Pixel 4 costs more money than LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.