Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than LG V10, getting a global score of 82.9 against 78.6. Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer and a little thinner phone than LG V10, but it is a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a more powerful CPU than LG V10, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores.
The LG V10 has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per screen inch, a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG V10 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V10 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V10 features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with better 120 frames per second video frame rates and a much more MP back facing camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V10, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.