Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the LG V10's general score of 78.6. Google Pixel 5's design is noticeably newer, just a bit thinner and way lighter than the LG V10. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior CPU than LG V10, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V10 has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. LG V10 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V10 takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and faster 120 fps video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 5 features a very superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than the LG V10, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.