Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | -- |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | -- |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a bit better than LG V10, having a general score of 82.2 against 78.6. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a extremely lighter and much thinner phone than the LG V10. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a newer 14 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The LG V10 has a much greater hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has an inferior number of cores and 12 GB lesser RAM memory. The LG V10 counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much higher display pixels density.
The LG V10 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower video resolution and a much lower 16 MP resolution camera. LG V10 features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a very superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.