Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is a bit better than HTC One M9, getting a general score of 78.6 against 77.7. Although LG V10 and HTC One M9 were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG V10 design is somewhat thinner but heavier than HTC One M9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has 5.1 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One M9 has a lot better hardware performance than LG V10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores, an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The LG V10 features just a bit better display than HTC One M9, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a quite better display density and a little bit bigger display.
LG V10 captures clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture. LG V10 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
LG V10 counts with just a little better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC One M9. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One M9, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.