Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | 16 777 216 |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a overall score of 78.6 against 77. Although the LG V10 is a better cellphone than HTC U Ultra, we must tell that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone. The LG V10 counts with a better looking display than HTC U Ultra. Both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a same size screen and a greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the HTC U Ultra also has a greater number of cores. LG V10 and HTC U Ultra both count with similar storage for applications and games, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery life in LG V10. The LG V10 features a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a way more MP camera.
The LG V10 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.