Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Sky Blue and White |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is slightly better than LG K62, getting a 78.6 score against 78.2. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V10 has 5.1 version while LG K62 has Android 10. Even though the LG V10 is better than LG K62, we must highlight that it is also an a lot older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone.
The LG K62 counts with a more powerful processor than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the LG K62 also has more CPU cores. The LG V10 counts with a lot better display than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better count of pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The LG V10 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor and a lot lower resolution back camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The LG K62 counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V10, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has 64 GB more internal storage.
LG K62 features greater battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.