Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Titan gray |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is a bit better than the LG V10, with a overall score of 85.4 against 78.6. LG K92's body is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than LG V10's, although it is just a bit heavier. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
LG K92 has a superior processing power than LG V10, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). LG V10 counts with a much better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG K92 has a much better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with a way better resolution. LG K92 counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than LG V10, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG K92 counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG K92 is more expensive than the LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.