Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-10-01 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | 16 777 216 |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than LG V10's 78.6 global score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides some nice extra features. The LG V30S ThinQ is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than the LG V10.
The LG V10 counts with a little bit better display than LG V30S ThinQ, although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch and a little smaller display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a greater hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a better memory to store more apps and games than LG V10, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V10 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a larger back camera sensor and faster video frame rate.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better battery life than LG V10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V10. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V10, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.