Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black and Gray |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the LG V10's 78.6 global score. LG V35 ThinQ is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and thinner than the LG V10. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The LG V10 has a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the LG V10 one, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and the same internal memory.
LG V10 features a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos in low-light environments, and they both have a back camera with a 16 megapixels and the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with better 120 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better battery life than LG V10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.