Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the LG V10, with an 87.1 score against 78.6. The LG Velvet is a much newer cellphone, and it's also a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the LG V10. The LG Velvet has a quite better processing power than LG V10, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG V10 counts with a much better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG Velvet counts with a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
The LG Velvet counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V10, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage. LG Velvet features a superior battery life than LG V10, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.