Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-10-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V10 is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, having a overall score of 78.6 against 75.8. These phones have Android OS, but the LG V10 has the older 5.1 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. LG V10 is an older, somewhat heavier and thicker device than the Moto Z Force. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit more powerful processor than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a higher number of cores.
The LG V10 features a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The LG V10 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a camera with lot less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, they both have the same aperture.
The Moto Z Force and LG V10 both have very similar memory to install applications and games, both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
LG V10 costs a little more than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.