Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has an overall score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. The LG V10 is an older, a lot heavier and incredibly thicker phone than the Moto Z2 Play. The LG V10 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a little larger screen and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto Z2 Play and LG V10 count with very similar storage for games and applications, they have the same internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a faster processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has 7 more processing cores.
Moto Z2 Play's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in LG V10. The LG V10 shoots much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the LG V10 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and higher video frame rate.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.