Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is a bit better than LG V10's 78.6 score. The Motorola One Hyper body is noticeably newer, but a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than LG V10. These devices come with Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, counting with a lot of extra features.
LG V10 features a better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper has a bit more powerful processor than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has more processing cores.
Motorola One Hyper has just a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola One Hyper features a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than LG V10, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper features greater battery life than LG V10, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs more than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V10. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V10, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.