Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than LG V10's 78.6 general score. Even though the Motorola One Zoom is a little thicker than the LG V10, it's just a little lighter and newer. The Motorola One Zoom has just a bit better performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a higher number of faster cores.
The LG V10 has a better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Motorola One Zoom features a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a larger camera aperture, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
LG V10 counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Zoom has improved battery performance than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V10, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.