Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 15 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | -- |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the LG V10, getting a 79.2 score against 78.6. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is notably newer and a lot thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the LG V10.
The LG V10 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. LG V10 has a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better photos and videos than LG V10, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a much better video resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V10, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.