Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Ocean |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is slightly better than LG V10's 78.6 general score. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is a lot newer than LG V10's, although it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro and LG V10 both feature quite similar displays, although the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a larger display. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better performing CPU than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower 60 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a much more mega-pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.