Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V10 is just a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G, having a 78.6 score against 77.4. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has an older 5.1 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. Even though LG V10 is much older and a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A15 5G, it's body is still just a bit lighter.
The LG V10 features a very superior processor than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has 7 less CPU cores , they both have the same RAM amount. LG V10 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel count per inch of display.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than LG V10, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A15 5G features a superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V10 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a way higher video resolution.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V10, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.