Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is just a bit better than Galaxy A20s, with a overall score of 78.6 against 77. Even being the best we compare here, the LG V10 construction is extremely older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier than Galaxy A20s. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG V10 has the previous 5.1 version while Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A20s has a bit better performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A20s also has a greater number of 1.8 GHz cores. The LG V10 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a much better pixels density.
LG V10 has a superior camera than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V10 also has a camera with a higher resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality. LG V10 has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s has superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.