Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is slightly better than the Galaxy A21, with a score of 78.6 against 76.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has 5.1 version and Galaxy A21 has Android 10. The LG V10 design is a little bit lighter than Galaxy A21, but it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy A21 features a better performing processing unit than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The LG V10 features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
LG V10 features a better camera than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a same resolution back camera, the LG V10 also has a way better (4K) video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs. The LG V10 has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with improved battery performance than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A21. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V10, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A21, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.