Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the LG V10, with a 79.9 score against 78.6. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it gives lots of additional features and performance tweaks. Although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little heavier than LG V10, it's just a little bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
The LG V10 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. The LG V10 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater pixels count per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.