Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is a bit better than the LG V10, having an 81.3 score against 78.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A31 has the newer 10 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A31 construction has the same thickness than the LG V10, but it is a little lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a bit superior processor than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has 7 more cores. The LG V10 features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count in each inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The LG V10 has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A31 has a very superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V10, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.