Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | -- |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the LG V10's score of 78.6. Even though the Galaxy A35 5G is just a little bit heavier than the LG V10, it's just a bit thinner and also way newer. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The LG V10 has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores. LG V10 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger sensor. LG V10 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.