Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Prism cube black |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the LG V10, getting a 90.8 score against 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body has the same thickness than the LG V10, but it is a little lighter. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version.
Galaxy A51 5G features a faster processing unit than LG V10, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. LG V10 has a much better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than LG V10, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G costs more than LG V10, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.