Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A6's general score of 75.8. LG V10 is a noticeably older, thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A6. Galaxy A6 has just a little better processing power than LG V10, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores.
The LG V10 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a way higher pixels amount per display inch and a little bigger display. LG V10 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the LG V10 also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG V10 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A6's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in LG V10.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V10, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.