Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a 78.6 score against 76.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. LG V10's construction is incredibly older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior performance than LG V10, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The LG V10 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG V10 features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with better video frame rate and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The LG V10 features a little bit better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 has a way better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
LG V10 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.