Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Prism bricks black |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than LG V10's 78.6 score. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has a more recent 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a lot newer phone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than LG V10.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a greater performance than LG V10, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. LG V10 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than the LG V10, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.