Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a little bit better than the LG V10, getting a score of 85.2 against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the LG V10. LG V10 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
LG V10 features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a better performing processor than LG V10, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with greater battery life than LG V10, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity. The LG V10 takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos and a back camera with a way worse 16 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.