Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the LG V10, with a score of 88.1 against 78.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, giving lots of additional features and performance optimizations. Galaxy F62 is a incredibly newer phone than LG V10, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior hardware performance than LG V10, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM. LG V10 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better screen density.
The Galaxy F62 takes better photographs and videos than LG V10, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG V10, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.