Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the LG V10's global score of 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a extremely newer and much thinner phone than the LG V10, although it's extremely heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, offering a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
LG V10 features a much better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy Fold counts with a greater performance than LG V10, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. LG V10 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG V10 also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and better 120 fps video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V10, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.