Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the LG V10's 78.6 general score. Galaxy M20's body is extremely newer and a little lighter, but also a little bit thicker than LG V10. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has the newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it provides you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a little bit better performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a larger number of cores. LG V10 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The LG V10 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V10 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V10 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments, a much higher (4K) video definition, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a better 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.