Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black and Blue |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than the LG V10, with a global score of 82.4 against 78.6. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it counts with lots of additional features and optimized performance. Galaxy M30 is a way newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and a little lighter than the LG V10.
The LG V10 has a brighter screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better pixels number in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy M30 has just a bit better performance than LG V10, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of 1800 MHz cores.
The LG V10 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M30 has a really longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V10 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos, a back facing camera with more megapixels, a way higher video resolution and a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.