Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black and White |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than LG V10, having a global score of 87.7 against 78.6. The Galaxy M51 construction is newer than LG V10's, but it's just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy M51 features a faster processing unit than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cores. The LG V10 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
LG V10 counts with a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.