Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the LG V10's 78.6 general score. Galaxy Note 20's construction is newer and just a bit thinner than LG V10's, although it is also a bit heavier. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a quite better processing power than LG V10, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM.
The LG V10 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per display inch. LG V10 features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a camera that is very similar to the LG V10 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a way less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V10, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.