Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than the LG V10, having an 89 score against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than LG V10. The Galaxy Note10 features a quite superior performance than LG V10, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores.
LG V10 has a brighter screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. LG V10 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V10 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with faster video frame rates and a back camera with a lot better 16 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V10. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V10, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.