Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than LG V10's 78.6 score. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has a newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1. Galaxy S10's design is extremely newer, lighter and just a little thinner than LG V10. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a quite superior performance than LG V10, because it has 7 more cpu cores and more RAM.
The LG V10 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit lower pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a bit worse 2560 x 1440px resolution. LG V10 counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V10 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with faster video frame rates and a way better 16 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy S10 counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 is also cheap compared to the LG V10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.