Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than the LG V10's 78.6 score. These devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it gives you some additional features and optimized performance. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner device than the LG V10, although it is a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a greater performance than LG V10, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. LG V10 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
LG V10 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
LG V10 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and higher video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 5G costs more than the LG V10, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.