Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-10-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is slightly better than LG V10, with a general score of 86.3 against 78.6. The Galaxy S10e is a noticeably newer device, and it's also a little bit thinner and way lighter than LG V10. Galaxy S10e counts with a better performing processor than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The LG V10 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The LG V10 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality pictures and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V10 also counts with faster video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The LG V10 counts with a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a little better battery performance than LG V10, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10e costs a lot more than LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.