Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than LG V10, getting a 90.8 score against 78.6. The Galaxy S20 FE is a notably newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG V10. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the newer 11 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it counts with lots of additional features and optimized performance.
LG V10 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 7 more cores. Galaxy S20 FE has a really longer battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size. LG V10 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a much smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rate and a much better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more money than the LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.