Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than LG V10, with a score of 98 against 78.6. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is noticeably newer, but heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG V10.
LG V10 has a little bit better display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG V10, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater hardware performance than LG V10, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than LG V10, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way larger sensor, a lot better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V10, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.