Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | -- |
| Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is much better than LG V10, with a score of 89.1 against 78.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S21 FE has the newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Galaxy S21 FE is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and a little thinner than the LG V10.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a better performing processor than LG V10, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory. LG V10 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG V10 has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size camera aperture, the LG V10 also has faster 120 fps video frame rate and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a really longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S21 FE, else you can save some money and buy the LG V10, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.