Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than LG V10, with a 95.4 score against 78.6. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than the LG V10, although it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than LG V10, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more powerful CPU than LG V10, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than LG V10, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher 108 MP resolution back camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
LG V10 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V10. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V10, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.