Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-01 | -- |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | -- |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.28 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than LG V10, having a overall score of 82.6 against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and way thinner phone than the LG V10. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with some extra features and increased performance.
LG V10 has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a bit better looking display than LG V10, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The LG V10 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 has improved battery duration than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S25 has a better camera than LG V10, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot larger sensor, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG V10, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.