Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Black |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the LG V10, getting an 81 score against 78.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is noticeably newer than LG V10's, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG V10 has a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better performing processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher number of cores.
LG V10 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery life than LG V10, because it has a 35% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG V10, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.