Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than LG V10, having a overall score of 88.5 against 78.6. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1. Galaxy Z Flip's body is way newer, a little bit lighter and thinner than LG V10. Galaxy Z Flip has a better processor than LG V10, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
The LG V10 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display. LG V10 counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. LG V10 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and faster video frame rates.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V10, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.